Guide to Choosing Your Next Polyurethane Track Pads for Your Cold Milling Machine

     Choosing the right polyurethane track pads for your Cold Milling Machine can significantly impact your operational efficiency, cost savings, and overall machine performance. With numerous options available in the market, making an informed decision is crucial for maximizing the lifespan of your equipment and ensuring optimal functionality in various milling conditions.

In this guide, we will walk you through the essential factors to consider when selecting polyurethane track pads for your cold milling machine. From understanding the benefits of polyurethane material to evaluating specific product features and compatibility, we aim to provide you with comprehensive insights that will help you make the best choice for your needs. Whether you're a seasoned contractor or new to the industry, this guide will equip you with the knowledge to enhance your milling operations and achieve superior results.

Purpose of this Blog:

• Provide knowledge and tools for assessing aftermarket polyurethane pads.
• Aim to reduce maintenance expenses in asphalt milling.
• Link to an additional guide on pad replacement.

Who Will Benefit:

• Contrators looking for a better poly pad solution.
• Contractors aiming for better asphalt milling performance and efficiency.
• Contractors looking to reduce the operational cost of asphalt milling.

Table of Contents:
1. Risks of Using Inferior Poly Pads
2. Basic Consideration Indicators to Compare Poly Pads
3. Challenges for Poly Pads to Address Each Indicator
4. How to Assess Whether a Poly Pad Addresses the Challenges Well
5. How to Evaluate a Manufacturer's Capabilities in Poly Pad Production
6. Taking the Next Steps

I. Risks of Using Inferior Poly Pads

• Increased Unexpected Downtime: Low-quality pads often fail prematurely, causing unexpected downtime and disrupting your project schedule.
• Higher Replacement Requirements and Direct Pad Expenses: Frequent replacements of low-quality pads lead to increased direct expenses and maintenance costs.60
• Reduced Lifespan of Whole Machine: The unstable traction support from low-quality pads can shorten the overall lifespan of your milling machines.
• Reduced Lifespan of Undercarriage System Parts: Other parts of the undercarriage system also suffer from the increased strain and wear caused by low-quality pads, leading to more frequent repairs and replacements.
  

II. Why Selecting Poly Pads is so important

III. Challenges for Poly Pads to Address Each Indicator

High-quality poly pads must address multiple performance indicators, each presenting unique challenges. Ensuring durability, consistent load-bearing capacity, and abrasion resistance requires the use of superior materials and advanced manufacturing processes. Here's a detailed look at why these challenges are difficult to address:

Challenge #1: Abrasion & Cut Resistance

Issue: Asphalt cold planers often operate on curbs or milled road surfaces, which erodes the surface of poly track pads. Without high wear and tear resistance, poly compounds cannot withstand the abrasive action of curbs and asphalt particles under heavy loads, leading to partial exfoliation and premature failure.

Solution: Proper Poly Compound

• Premium Material: Use high-quality polyurethane with low ionization energy, great heat tolerance, and compressive strength.
• Enhanced Properties: Seek compounds offering superior heat tolerance, wear resistance, tear resistance, and compressive strength.

• Resilience strength
• Compressive strength
• Low heat penetration coefficients
• Cut resistance
• Abrasion resistance

Challenge #2: Traction Capabilities

Issue: Milling machines need traction to stay stable during the cutting process. Poor traction leads to unstable movement, negatively impacting operational performance.

Why It's Hard to Address:

Solution: Special Traction Poly Formula

• Innovative Formula: Incorporate a special chemical formula to enhance the traction ability of polyurethane.
• Improved Stability: This ensures the milling machine's stability, providing a better operational experience and consistent performance during pavement removal.

Challenge #3: Weight Load Strength

Issue: Milling machines, weighing up to 49 tons, require poly track pads that can withstand heavy loads to prevent abnormal bending and curves.

Why It's Hard to Address:

Solution: Proprietary Support Frame and Built-In Steel Plate

• Engineered Structure: Use a built-in plate combined with a patented support frame to significantly enhance the adhesive force and strength of the poly track pads.
• Durability: This design prevents unexpected breakage, ensuring reliable performance even on uneven and rugged road surfaces.

IV. How to Assess Whether a Poly Pad Addresses the Challenges Well

Using the provided test report information as a standard, here's how to assess whether a poly pad addresses the necessary performance indicators effectively:

Longevity

• Heat Tolerance: Assess the material’s ability to withstand high temperatures without degrading.
• Heat Penetration Coefficient: Ensure the material has a low heat penetration coefficient to prevent overheating during extended use.
• Hardness of the track pads: Request the testing data to ensure that the track pads' hardness is around 92 HRC.

• Q1: Does the material exhibit high heat tolerance and low heat penetration, ensuring it remains stable under prolonged use?
• Q2: Are there documented results showing the material’s performance in high-temperature environments?
• Q3: What is the specific hardness rating of the track pads, and how does it compare to industry standards?

2. Abrasion Resistance:

• Abrasion Resistance (ISO 4649:2017 Method A): Evaluates how much material is lost due to abrasion. The test report shows a relative volume loss of 29.0 mm³. Lower values indicate better abrasion resistance.
  

• Q4: Is the abrasion resistance (e.g., 29.0 mm³) low enough to ensure durability in harsh conditions?

3. Compressive Strength:

• Load-Bearing Capacity: Ensure the pad can support the maximum load of the milling machine without deforming.
• Structural Design: Review the design features, such as built-in plates and support frames, that enhance the pad's strength and adhesive force.

• Q5: Can the pad withstand the heavy loads of milling machines, up to 42 tons, without abnormal bending or curves?

Premature Failure Resistance

• Shore Hardness (ISO 868:2003): A measure of the hardness of the material. For instance, the report shows a result of A/15: 96. Higher values indicate a harder and potentially more wear-resistant material.

• Q1: Does the Shore hardness meet or exceed the standard value (e.g., A/15: 96) for high abrasion resistance?

• Impact Resistance: Ensure the pad can absorb and recover from heavy impacts without permanent deformation.
• Tear Strength (ISO 34-1:2015 Method B): Indicates the material's resistance to tearing. The test report result is 149 kN/m, which is a strong indicator of good tear resistance.

• Q2: Does the material show high resilience strength to prevent early damage and reduce the likelihood of premature failure?
• Q3: Is the tear strength value (e.g., 149 kN/m) sufficient to resist tearing under operational stresses?

Operation PerformanceKey Indicators to Assess: 

• Shore Hardness (ISO 868:2003): A measure of the hardness of the material. For instance, the report shows a result of A/15: 96. Higher values indicate a harder and potentially more wear-resistant material.
  

• Q1: Does the Shore hardness meet or exceed the standard value (e.g., A/15: 96) for high abrasion resistance?

• Traction Capabilities: Look for details on any special chemical formulas used to enhance traction.
• Field Performance: Check if the poly pads have documented field performance results demonstrating improved traction and stability.
  

• Q2: Does the pad incorporate a special chemical formula to enhance traction?
• Q3: Are there performance test results or user feedback indicating improved stability and traction during operation?

• Traction Efficiency: Evaluate the poly pads' ability to provide stable and significant traction support to move forward while the milling teeth cut the surface.

• Q4: Does the pad provide the necessary traction support to ensure smooth and efficient milling operations?

V. How to Evaluate a Manufacturer's Capabilities in Poly Pad Production

Evaluate a manufacturer’s capabilities by examining their R&D and design experience, engineering and manufacturing precision, innovative wear-resistant solutions, rigorous quality control measures, and investment in technology and workforce training. These factors are indicative of a manufacturer’s ability to produce high-quality poly pads.

VI. Taking the Next Steps

Get Started Today!